• Home
  • About
  • Archive
  • Jenner & Block
  • EHS Practice

Insurance Recovery

  • February 4, 2016

    Failure to Provide Notice to Excess Insurer Dooms Insurance Recovery for Environmental Settlement

    A California appellate court recently affirmed a lower court decision that concluded that an insured’s failure to obtain consent from its excess insurer precluded it from recovering insurance proceeds from that insurer. Continue reading

    Air, Climate Change, Hazmat, Sustainability
    Air, appellate, CERCLA, Climate Change, Critical Environmental, Environmental Lawyer, Fidelity & Casualty of New York (“F&C”), GHG, Health & Safety Developments, Insurance Recovery, OSHA, RCRA, TSCA, Water
Follow @x

Corporate Environmental LAwyer Editor

Steven M. Siros
Partner
ssiros@jenner.com

Categories

  • Air
  • CERCLA
  • Climate Change
  • Consumer Law and Environment
  • Contamination
  • COVID-19
  • Emerging Contaminants
  • Environmental Law
  • EPA
  • EPR
  • FDA
  • FIFRA
  • Food & Beverage
  • Greenhouse Gas
  • Groundwater
  • Hazmat
  • Microplastics
  • NEPA
  • OSHA
  • Plastic
  • Prop 65
  • RCRA
  • Real Estate and Environment
  • Recycling
  • Sustainability
  • Toxic Tort
  • TSCA
  • UCMR 5
  • Waste
  • Water

Favorite Links

  • Center For Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES)
  • Illinois Pollution Control Board
  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration
  • US Environmental Protection Agency
  • The Environmental Law Institute (ELI)

Recent Posts

  • After Sackett: Federal Wetlands Regulation, the Trump Administration’s Rulemaking, and What Comes Next
  • From Regulation to Litigation: Climate Tort Risk After the Endangerment Finding Repeal
  • NAAQS: Litigation Trends and Stalled Rulemakings
  • Home
  • About
  • Archive
  • Jenner & Block
  • EHS Practice

Attorney Advertising • Legal Notices

 

Loading Comments...