California
-
California Adopts Non-Emergency COVID-19 Prevention Workplace Regulations

On December 15, 2022, the California Occupational Safety & Health Standards Board (Board) adopted COVID-19 prevention non-emergency workplace standards in a 6-1 vote. Continue reading
-
Governor Newsom Vetoes PFAS Reporting Bill But Signs Into Law Legislation Banning PFAS in Cosmetics and Textiles

On September 29, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed Assembly Bill No. 2247. The bill would have required manufacturers of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) or products or product components containing intentionally added PFAS to register the PFAS or products or product components on a publicly accessible data collection interface, along with other information. Continue reading
-
California Law Adds New Restrictions on Recyclability Claims

On October 5, 2021, California Governor Newsom signed SB 343, addressing recyclability claims on products and in advertising. Continue reading
-
Analysis of Recent and Forthcoming State Legislation on Toxic Chemicals in Cosmetics and Personal Care Products and Preemptive Effects of Existing Federal Legislation
According to a report released in February 2021 by the organization Safer States, at least 27 US states will consider proposed legislation to regulate toxic chemicals in 2021. While a large driver of the proposed state laws is growing public concern over drinking water contamination from “emerging contaminants,” including PFAS (per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances)… Continue reading
adverse human health effects, California, commerce, Contamination, Cosmetics, drinking water, Emerging Contaminants, exposure, FD&C Act, Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, Federal Regulation, Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act of the 21st Century, high-priority chemicals, New York, personal care products, PFAS, polyfluorinated alkyl substances, products, regulated, risk of injury to health or environment, Safer States, Toxic Chemicals, Toxic Substrates Control Act, TSCA -
OSHA under Deadline for a Nationwide COVID 19 Workplace Safety Rule: Four States’ Existing Laws and New Federal Guidance and Orders Foretell the Future
On his first full day in office, President Biden issued an Executive Order on Protecting Worker Health and Safety, which required OSHA to “consider whether any emergency temporary standards on COVID‑19, including with respect to masks in the workplace, are necessary,” and if so, to issue such emergency temporary standards (ETS) by March 15, 2021. Executive… Continue reading
13999, 2021, 29 U.S.C. § 655(c), 49 U.S.C. § 20104, aerosol inhalation, Aerosol-Transmitted Disease, ani-retaliation, assess risks of exposure, § 2(b) (Jan. 21, best practice, California, CDC guidance, controls, COVID-19, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, emergency temporary standards, ETS, exposure, Federal Railroad Administration, General Duty Clause, Governor, guidance, Guidance on Mitigating and Preventing the Spread of COVID-19, hazard assessment, hazard of death, hygiene, Identification and Isolation of Sick Employees, Illness Prevention Plan, implementing controls, isolation, January 29, Jeffrey Zients, March 15, Michigan, OIG Report, Oregon, OSH Act, OSHA, Package Delivery Work, personal injury, PPE, President Biden, Protecting Worker Health and Safety, public health directives and orders, quarantine, regulation, return to work, Section 6(c), significant harm, social distancing, Standard Specification for Barrier Face Coverings, TSA, Virginia, workplace flexibilities training -
California Supreme Court Rules Environmental Report Need Not Address GHG Executive Order
On July 13, 2017, Judge Timothy Taylor of the Supreme Court of California issued an opinion in the case of Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Association of Governments, no. S223603, ruling that the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) did not abuse its discretion by issuing an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a… Continue reading
-
Federal Court Approves $14.7 Billion Volkswagen Settlement
On October 25, 2016, Judge Charles Breyer of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California approved a $14.7 billion partial settlement in the Volkswagen “defeat device” MDL litigation. The settlement resolves injunctive relief claims brought by the United States and the State of California, as well as consumer class action claims related… Continue reading
