employer
-
Virginia’s COVID-19 Workplace Safety Regulation Is Permanent: A National Model
In July 2020, we reported that Virginia, an OSHA State-plan State, was the first in the country to issue a workplace safety regulation specifically addressing COVID‑19. At that time, the Virginia standard was issued as a temporary emergency rule, which would expire by January 27, 2021, unless made permanent. On the expiration date, Governor Northam… Continue reading
16VAC25-220, access to exposure, access to medical records, administrative, airplanes, airports, and correctional and detention facilities, § 10.C, § 10.E, § 30, § 70.C.3.a.(4), § 80.B.8.f., bars, bus stations, COVID-19, disinfection, employee, employee notification, employer, Engineering, exposure assessment, exposure determination, exposure level, exposure risk level, face covering, face mask, fewer than 11 employees, fewer than eleven employees, first responders, Governor Northam, healthcare industry, high risk, hotels, immunocompromised, infected, Infectious Disease Prevention, large social gatherings, low risk, maintain physical distancing, mandatory CDC guidelines, mandatory physical distancing of employees, March 26, medium risk, minimal occupational contact, mortuary services, movie theaters, non-mandatory CDC guidelines, OSHA State-plan, package delivery, parties, Permanent Standard, physical distancing, PPE, preparedness plans, protective measures, regulation, rest stops, restaurants, retaliation, return to work, Sanitation, SARS-CoV-2, small business, State Health Commissioner, telework, train stations, training requirements, Virginia, Virginia Commissioner of Labor and Industry, Virginia State Plan for Occupational Safety and Health, Virus, VOSH, work practice controls, Workplace, written infectious disease plans -
U.S. OSHA Issues Guidance on Returning to Work
On June 18, 2020, U.S. OSHA issued its “Guidance on Returning to Work,” (“Reopening Guidance”) compiling best practices and existing regulatory standards to assist employers and workers return to work and reopen businesses characterized as non-essential in the earlier weeks of the COVID‑19 pandemic. Continue reading
2020, 29 CFR 1910.132, 29 CFR 1910.141, agency standards for personal protective equipment, anti-retaliation, best practices, biohazard, C9 CFR 1910.134, CDC, community transmission, contact tracing, control and prevention, controls, coronavirus, COVID-19, disinfect, disinfection practices, employee, employee training, employer, enhanced cleaning, environmental health, federal law, federal standards, Gabrielle Sigel, General Duty Clause, Guidance on Preparing Workplaces for COVID-19, Guidelines for Opening Up America Again, hazard assessment, Hazmat, health screenings, hygiene, identification, isolation, isolation of sick employee, June 18, Leah Song, mask, monitoring, non-essential business; stay-at-home, Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, OSHA, OSHA standards, PPE, reopening, Reopening Guidance, resurgence, return to work, return to work after illness or exposure, return-to-work procedures, SARS-CoV-2, Section 5(a)(1), shelter-in-place order, sick employee, social distancing, state law, temperature checks, temporary closure of business, testing, training, worker protection, workplace flexibilities -
OSHA Promises Relaxed Enforcement during Pandemic if Employers Make “Good Faith Effort” to Comply with Non-Achievable Recurring Requirements
On April 17, 2020, OSHA posted an April 16, 2020 enforcement guidance, which, for the first time, recognized that due to COVID-19, employers were not able to feasibly comply with a wide-range of OSHA regulatory requirements. Continue reading
2020, annual audiograms, annual training requirements, April 16, assessments, audiometric evaluation, certification, compliance officers, coronavirus, COVID-19, Discretion in Enforcement, employee, employer, enforcement guidance, Good Faith Guidance, inspection, OSHA, OSHA-regulated industries, pandemic, Process Safety Management revalidations and reviews, recurring audits, Recurring Requirements, regulated industry, regulatory requirement, regulatory requirements, relicensing, remote training, respirator spirometry testing, reviews, training -
OSHA to Most Employers: Limited Exemption from Recording Requirement for Employees’ COVID 19 Cases
On April 10, 2020, US OSHA partially retracted its initial instructions to employers, which had required employers to evaluate employees who contracted COVID‑19 as potential recordable occupational illnesses under OSHA’s injury/illness recordkeeping rules, 29 CFR Part 1904. Continue reading
CFR § 1904.5, community transmission, coronavirus, COVID-19, employer, enforcement discretion, fatal, healthcare, injury/illness, Limited Exemption, OSHA, OSHA 300 logs, recordable occupational illnesses, recording criteria, Recording Requirement, recordkeeping violation, reduce risk, Virus, work-related illness, work-related incident -
Does the OSH Act Give an Employee the Right to Refuse to Work Due to Fear of Workplace COVID-19 Exposure?
Responding to COVID‑19, many state and local governments are issuing orders encouraging or requiring workers to stay at home (“Stay-At-Home Order”) unless their employment is deemed to be in an “essential business” or “critical infrastructure industry.” Continue reading
29 U.S.C. § 654, 29 CFR § 1977, 29 U.S.C. § 660(c)(2), anti-retaliation provision, coronavirus, COVID-19, critical infrastructure industry, employee, employer, essential business, General Duty Clause, OSH Act, OSHA, public health crisis, refusal to work, retaliation, Section 5(a)(1), stay-at-home order, Workers’ Right to Refuse Dangerous Work, Workplace